Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

the_three_psychologies_of_guns [2014/03/12 07:28] (current)
donya568 created
Line 1: Line 1:
 +.
 +Psychology I
 +A sector of our population fear guns, see zero have to have for them, and believe we will be far superior off if civilians did not personal them... period. As with most views, it holds a specific level of truth-no guns, no murders or suicides by guns. Together with the will to enact incredibly strict laws, even criminals could be hard-pressed to get them; Japan, Australia and Briton are prime examples where death-rates by guns are inside the low double-digits per year, in glaring contrast to America, a horrific 30,000 per year.
 +The persons in this group fear the terrible finality guns pose, the ease at which they make attainable to snuff out a life-a 1/4? pull spells death-and that no so-called "right to own" trumps the precious worth of life. They really feel there's no goal to these instruments except to kill, with zero reconciliation for their existence in civilian life or to humanity. Their position is not altogether unfounded- a study in 2011 in the UCLA College of Public Wellness; amongst 23 high-income developed countries, 80% of all gun deaths, 86% of all women, and 87% of all children occurred in the U.S.
 +
 +The proponents of quite strict gun laws are frustrated since of their inability to know why great decent individuals would choose to have access to instruments of death, and they might think that access to 911 is definitely the only protection they will need against a violent intruder, ignoring the fact that time is on the essence.
 +
 +They see that gun violence is out of handle and don't equate freedom with gun ownership, and would feel safer and freer with out them.
 +
 +Psychology II
 +The individuals within this group are mainly gun owners who obviously believe in the Second Amendment for the right to own one particular, are responsible gun owners, as well as help reasonable gun regulation like a viable extensive data base, a ban on semi-automatic military weapons due to the fact they feel these weapons make the country a lot more hazardous (the Pew Center), a ban on substantial clips, and strict laws to dismantle the loophole where 40% of guns are acquired illegally.
 +
 +The NRA surely doesn't represent them, and they don't buy to get a New York second the appalling hypocrisy on the NRA when it states, "Guns never kill individuals, individuals kill people," then block any and each attempt to help keep guns out with the hands of the wrong people today. They are sickened by the massive gun-deaths our nation suffers every year, and it resonates with them once they hear the President ask, "Are we seriously ready to say that we're powerless inside the face of such carnage:"
 +
 +Their purpose for gun ownership is always to get pleasure from target shooting, hunting and dwelling protection. They are equally balanced in both the rights to protect gun ownership along with the [[http://www.sgtshine.com/2014/03/sell-and-buy-used-weapons-on-the-net/|´╗┐pellet guns]]  value of controlling gun ownership. The exciting fact about gun ownership is that the price is double within the countryside than it can be in the city, yet gun violence is for the most element, a city problem. This group represents the overwhelming majority of gun owners.
 +
 +Psychology III
 +The individuals here are also responsible gun owners and think the prime objective of owning guns is protection against government tyranny. Distrusting and suspecting their own government would betray the men and women. What exactly is behind this suspicion and fear of men and women who continually envision this situation, and additional think the only savior to this evil will be to be nicely, even heavily armed? These are people today that have lived in this wealthiest and most secure country on the planet for decades, enjoying all the wonderful positive aspects it bestows upon them without having any interruption of them in any form, however they've formed a deep-seated paranoia of their government, believing it is poised to subjugate them in the 1st chance, to disarm them with the mental image of armed forces appearing at their door to confiscate their valuable weapons-they getting the only points that may save them from this perceived governmental enslavement. Their guns getting the symbol of freedom.
 +
 +They view the Second Amendment as the Holy Grail with the Constitution. Though it really is correct the amendment was initially written together with the intent to defend against the danger of a tyrannical government and most likely was deemed our 1st civic duty, it has to be noted it was written at a time of monarchies, as our nation was becoming subjugated by 1. That is certainly now an outdated concern, as our government is based upon We the Individuals for over two centuries.
 +
 +This acute suspicion and anti-government phobia seems to become assuaged only by an abiding association with gun acquisition, inducing a sense of security as they envision themselves warding off any governmental assault with their weaponry. This premise is addressed straight in Sam Harris' report, The Riddle of your Gun, where he writes, "[T]he concept that a couple of pistols and an AR 15 in just about every home constitutes a needed bulwark against totalitarianism is fairly ridiculous. Should you believe that the armed forces on the Usa may one day come for you personally. and you think your cache of small arms will suffice to defend you if they do, I've got a black helicopter to sell you."
 
the_three_psychologies_of_guns.txt · Last modified: 2014/03/12 07:28 by donya568
 
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license:CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
Recent changes RSS feed Donate Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki